VADIEβ’ Research Archive
Historical Decision Report
Official autonomous portfolio evidence retained from
the VisionX AI competition record.
Portfolio #132
Competition C104
Portfolio Engine v5.0
SETTLED
Research Identity
VDX Daily Top Picks #20260713
Strategy:
cmc_v4_daily_long_short
Submitted:
2026-07-11 00:05:01
Scored:
2026-07-27 13:10:02
Final Rank
#1
Rank reflects relative competition performance.
Final Score
-4.5107%
Engine Status
LIVE
Payout
No payout recorded
Portfolio Environment
Decision Context
Market Regime
Neutral
Macro Regime
Neutral
Breadth
Weak
Confidence
Very High
Expected Alpha
0.832
Optimizer
0.832
Portfolio Quality
0.910
Portfolio Risk
0.699
Balance
1.000
Diversification
1.000
Engine Provenance
Generation Record
Engine Family
Adaptive Quant Engine
Engine Version
v5.0
Engine Build
2026.07.04
Engine Mode
Long/Short Expected Alpha
Generated
2026-07-11 00:05:01
Historical Portfolio
Autonomous Decisions
Decision evidence exactly as retained when this
portfolio was generated.
LONG
LIT
Decision #1
Sector:
Defi Β· Pump risk:
Low Β· Crash risk:
Not recorded
Decision Score
0.788
Positive Evidence
β Strong momentum
β Strong trend
β High liquidity
β Positive sector tags
Negative Evidence
! Weak risk profile
Momentum
100%
Trend
90%
Liquidity
100%
Market Quality
45%
Risk Control
34%
Relative Strength
100%
Trend Acceleration
42%
Sector Rotation
60%
Sector Strength
49%
Supply Quality
25%
Mean Reversion Risk
β
Momentum Exhaustion
β
LONG
INJ
Decision #2
Sector:
Layer1 Β· Pump risk:
Low Β· Crash risk:
Not recorded
Decision Score
0.656
Positive Evidence
β High liquidity
β Controlled risk
β Positive sector tags
Negative Evidence
No negative factors recorded.
Momentum
58%
Trend
60%
Liquidity
100%
Market Quality
68%
Risk Control
89%
Relative Strength
54%
Trend Acceleration
66%
Sector Rotation
31%
Sector Strength
32%
Supply Quality
100%
Mean Reversion Risk
β
Momentum Exhaustion
β
SHORT
ADA
Decision #3
Sector:
Layer1 Β· Pump risk:
Low Β· Crash risk:
Not recorded
Decision Score
0.640
Positive Evidence
β High market quality
β Controlled risk
β Positive sector tags
Negative Evidence
No negative factors recorded.
Momentum
43%
Trend
40%
Liquidity
55%
Market Quality
83%
Risk Control
87%
Relative Strength
47%
Trend Acceleration
36%
Sector Rotation
31%
Sector Strength
32%
Supply Quality
81%
Mean Reversion Risk
β
Momentum Exhaustion
β
Learning Audit
Factor Intelligence
Portfolio-level audit summary. Each observation
represents one stored pick-factor result.
| Factor | Average | Range | Weight | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breadth | 0.000 | 0.000 β 0.000 | 1.0000 | 3 |
| Btc Relative Strength | 0.571 | 0.378 β 0.830 | 1.0000 | 3 |
| Depth | 0.497 | 0.102 β 1.000 | 1.0000 | 3 |
| Eth Relative Strength | 0.575 | 0.381 β 0.833 | 1.0000 | 3 |
| Liquidity | 0.851 | 0.552 β 1.000 | 1.0000 | 3 |
| Macro Btc Dominance | 0.677 | 0.677 β 0.677 | 1.0000 | 3 |
| Macro Eth Dominance | 0.160 | 0.160 β 0.160 | 1.0000 | 3 |
| Macro Fear Greed | 0.000 | 0.000 β 0.000 | 1.0000 | 3 |
| Market Quality | 0.652 | 0.450 β 0.827 | 1.0000 | 3 |
| Momentum | 0.668 | 0.428 β 1.000 | 1.0000 | 3 |
| Pump Risk | 0.200 | 0.200 β 0.200 | 1.0000 | 3 |
| Rank | 0.557 | 0.345 β 0.891 | 1.0000 | 3 |
| Relative Strength | 0.672 | 0.474 β 1.000 | 1.0000 | 3 |
| Risk Control | 0.699 | 0.335 β 0.890 | 1.0000 | 3 |
| Sector Rotation | 0.402 | 0.306 β 0.595 | 1.0000 | 3 |
| Sector Strength | 0.379 | 0.322 β 0.492 | 1.0000 | 3 |
| Supply Quality | 0.687 | 0.250 β 1.000 | 1.0000 | 3 |
| Trend | 0.635 | 0.405 β 0.897 | 1.0000 | 3 |
| Trend Acceleration | 0.478 | 0.361 β 0.657 | 1.0000 | 3 |
Outcome Intelligence
Failure Attribution
Post-competition attribution retained by the
learning engine.
LIT
Β· LONG
LOSS
Primary Cause:
Risk Control
Secondary Cause:
No secondary cause identified
Position Return:
-12.7018%
Attribution Confidence:
58%
INJ
Β· LONG
LOSS
Primary Cause:
Sector Strength
Secondary Cause:
No secondary cause identified
Position Return:
-3.7619%
Attribution Confidence:
62%
ADA
Β· SHORT
WIN
Primary Cause:
Winning Setup
Secondary Cause:
No secondary cause identified
Position Return:
+2.9316%
Attribution Confidence:
35%
Research output only. This report displays historical metadata
retained at portfolio generation and official competition outcome
data. Missing information is not reconstructed retroactively.